<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baby Brokaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw</link>
	<description>parenting with practical skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sivana</title>
		<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/comment-page-1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Sivana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/#comment-273</guid>
		<description>TV can&#039;t replace human interaction. When kids, especially young kids, watch TV, they tend to be very memorized by the colours and sounds so they don&#039;t really learn anything unless a parent (or, really, any other person, but I assume this would be a parent) is there interacting with them as well, drawing their attention to what&#039;s on the screen, asking them questions on the information being presented, pointing out examples in the room (&quot;look, a square. Can you see anything in the room that&#039;s square?&quot;). 

The other major issue I have with those baby genius dvds is that they flash their scenes and colours to keep a baby&#039;s attention, which, to me, will only encourage an inability to focus for long periods of time.

Just as a general rule, I&#039;d say stay away from any educational shows for babies and toddlers unless a human is right there in the room watching it and interacting with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV can&#8217;t replace human interaction. When kids, especially young kids, watch TV, they tend to be very memorized by the colours and sounds so they don&#8217;t really learn anything unless a parent (or, really, any other person, but I assume this would be a parent) is there interacting with them as well, drawing their attention to what&#8217;s on the screen, asking them questions on the information being presented, pointing out examples in the room (&#8220;look, a square. Can you see anything in the room that&#8217;s square?&#8221;). </p>
<p>The other major issue I have with those baby genius dvds is that they flash their scenes and colours to keep a baby&#8217;s attention, which, to me, will only encourage an inability to focus for long periods of time.</p>
<p>Just as a general rule, I&#8217;d say stay away from any educational shows for babies and toddlers unless a human is right there in the room watching it and interacting with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob A</title>
		<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/comment-page-1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/#comment-272</guid>
		<description>Number 1 son (5 y o) adores TV. Blood relations come a distant fourth in his list of attachments after it, his thumb (for sucking) and his favourite cuddle-toy.
Number 2 son (3 y o) is far less interested. It&#039;s fascinating how kids differ in so many ways.

As for Bab¥ €in$tein DVDs ... more unethical marketing to gullible parents I fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 1 son (5 y o) adores TV. Blood relations come a distant fourth in his list of attachments after it, his thumb (for sucking) and his favourite cuddle-toy.<br />
Number 2 son (3 y o) is far less interested. It&#8217;s fascinating how kids differ in so many ways.</p>
<p>As for Bab¥ €in$tein DVDs &#8230; more unethical marketing to gullible parents I fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orDover</title>
		<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/comment-page-1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>orDover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to read your follow-up post! I&#039;ve been really curious (read: skeptical) about the Baby Einstein DVDs. I hadn&#039;t heard of them until a few years ago, when I did a little bit of babysitting for a friend of my aunt&#039;s. She was very particular about who she let watch her child, and wanted to meet me for lunch, with her son in tow, before she officially &quot;hired&quot; me. He was 18 months old--you know, fully mobile and wanting to go exploring. He didn&#039;t like having to be strapped into his highchair as we ate and starting fussing. Immediately his mom pulled out a portable DVD player with a Baby Somethingorother DVD and turned it on. He was enraptured. Nearly hypnotized. He sat there for the remainder of our lunch completely silent, never moving his eyes from the screen. 

When it came time for the actual baby sitting his mom told me, obviously, just to pop in the DVDs to keep him occupied. At first I thought it was really neat--it sure made my job easier--and I really liked the way the videos attempted to introduce complex subjects like science, music composition, and even art history. But as I attempted to interact with the boy I found that he wasn&#039;t learning anything. We had watched Baby Galileo video at least three times through, and I tried to get him to talk to me about the sky or stars or anything. He couldn&#039;t even say &quot;clouds&quot; with me. His language skills were limited due to his age, but he really wasn&#039;t getting anything. He was just watching--staring at the screen as the little  puppets moved around. The shows were formatted to do nothing but hold attention. Every few seconds there is a bright flash of color, a moving object, or a change of scene. 

It seems like a really cool idea to introduce major figures like Galileo and Van Gogh and concepts like astronomy and fine art to your baby, but I think  it would be much more effective just to &lt;i&gt;talk&lt;/i&gt; to them about them, to actually engage with them instead of just plopping them in front of the TV and letting them be mesmerized by colorful graphics, all the while convincing yourself that you&#039;re helping them learn. I plan to teach my baby about Van Gogh, but I&#039;m going to do it by pulling out my beautiful art history survey text with the large colored plates and pointing to sunflowers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to read your follow-up post! I&#8217;ve been really curious (read: skeptical) about the Baby Einstein DVDs. I hadn&#8217;t heard of them until a few years ago, when I did a little bit of babysitting for a friend of my aunt&#8217;s. She was very particular about who she let watch her child, and wanted to meet me for lunch, with her son in tow, before she officially &#8220;hired&#8221; me. He was 18 months old&#8211;you know, fully mobile and wanting to go exploring. He didn&#8217;t like having to be strapped into his highchair as we ate and starting fussing. Immediately his mom pulled out a portable DVD player with a Baby Somethingorother DVD and turned it on. He was enraptured. Nearly hypnotized. He sat there for the remainder of our lunch completely silent, never moving his eyes from the screen. </p>
<p>When it came time for the actual baby sitting his mom told me, obviously, just to pop in the DVDs to keep him occupied. At first I thought it was really neat&#8211;it sure made my job easier&#8211;and I really liked the way the videos attempted to introduce complex subjects like science, music composition, and even art history. But as I attempted to interact with the boy I found that he wasn&#8217;t learning anything. We had watched Baby Galileo video at least three times through, and I tried to get him to talk to me about the sky or stars or anything. He couldn&#8217;t even say &#8220;clouds&#8221; with me. His language skills were limited due to his age, but he really wasn&#8217;t getting anything. He was just watching&#8211;staring at the screen as the little  puppets moved around. The shows were formatted to do nothing but hold attention. Every few seconds there is a bright flash of color, a moving object, or a change of scene. </p>
<p>It seems like a really cool idea to introduce major figures like Galileo and Van Gogh and concepts like astronomy and fine art to your baby, but I think  it would be much more effective just to <i>talk</i> to them about them, to actually engage with them instead of just plopping them in front of the TV and letting them be mesmerized by colorful graphics, all the while convincing yourself that you&#8217;re helping them learn. I plan to teach my baby about Van Gogh, but I&#8217;m going to do it by pulling out my beautiful art history survey text with the large colored plates and pointing to sunflowers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Perky Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/comment-page-1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>The Perky Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>BAH. 

At this point, I would LOVE to use my TV as a babysitter!!! But B will have none of it. He likes it just ok. He was not raised with TV, and he has &lt;i&gt;never&lt;/i&gt; been a self-sufficient kid. He craves adult attention and interaction, and given a choice between the TV and a grownup, he will keep on interrupting the grownup. Especially if said grownup is on the phone. ;) Also, if I happen to leave the door unlocked while I&#039;m washing dishes or something, he will be in the front yard before I know it!

*ahem* Sorry for venting-- the kids are out of school for Election Day in our county, and it has been a long day. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAH. </p>
<p>At this point, I would LOVE to use my TV as a babysitter!!! But B will have none of it. He likes it just ok. He was not raised with TV, and he has <i>never</i> been a self-sufficient kid. He craves adult attention and interaction, and given a choice between the TV and a grownup, he will keep on interrupting the grownup. Especially if said grownup is on the phone. <img src='http://domesticfather.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Also, if I happen to leave the door unlocked while I&#8217;m washing dishes or something, he will be in the front yard before I know it!</p>
<p>*ahem* Sorry for venting&#8211; the kids are out of school for Election Day in our county, and it has been a long day. <img src='http://domesticfather.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Helton</title>
		<link>http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/comment-page-1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Helton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domesticfather.com/2008/11/baby-brokaw/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Sure, those infant genius DVDs work quite well at lining their creators&#039; pockets.  Oh, that&#039;s not what you meant, is it?

My thinking on those is that they may be better than no stimulation, but cannot begin to replace actual interaction with other humans, which is our primary means of teaching and learning new information.  

Alas, I know what you mean about kids and the television.  My own kids watch more television than I had preferred (although we do restrict it somewhat and will be restricting it more), and they have occasionally had some issues playing by themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, those infant genius DVDs work quite well at lining their creators&#8217; pockets.  Oh, that&#8217;s not what you meant, is it?</p>
<p>My thinking on those is that they may be better than no stimulation, but cannot begin to replace actual interaction with other humans, which is our primary means of teaching and learning new information.  </p>
<p>Alas, I know what you mean about kids and the television.  My own kids watch more television than I had preferred (although we do restrict it somewhat and will be restricting it more), and they have occasionally had some issues playing by themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
